Which recording device ?

Which recording device ?

6.Which recording device ?

  1. Basic concepts about recording
    1. Microphones and directionality
    2. Zoom
    3. Recorder
  2. Different solutions for different uses
    1. Simple recorder
    2. Shotgun microphone + recorder
    3. Parabolic dish + recorder
    4. Build your own microphone
  3. Which settings ?

There are different types of microphones that can be used for birding, depending on the way you intend to record birds.

The choice of the microphone will mainly depend on :

  • What you want to record : soundscapes, individual birds, night migration ?
  • How much money you are willing to spend on a microphone. You can build your own microphone for a dozen euros, or buy a super-expensive dish…
  • Practical aspects : do you want to carry a big parabolic dish that will inhibit the use of binoculars, or a very handy microphone that you can keep in your pocket ? Or maybe you don’t even care about the handy aspect because you just want to put it on your roof during the night ?
  • Field-proof aspects : Do you want something that can withstand rain ? Do you want to be able to record in windy conditions ?

Let’s deal with all these questions sequentially

1. Basic concepts about recording

1.1 Microphones and directionality

First of all, you have to know that all the mics do not have the same directionality. Some microphones are directional, which means that they focus on a particular direction, thus limiting the sounds coming from the sides or the rear of the microphone. This is typically the case for shotgun microphones. When pointing a shotgun microphone at a singing bird, you will focus on that particular bird. Thus, the recording of that Song thrush (Turdus philomelos) singing just in front of your microphone will be loud and clear, while you will almost not hear the voice of people talking in your back, even if they speak as loud as the Song thrush. This is very practical for sound birding as you generally want to identify or record this single bird singing in that direction.

On the contrary if you want to record global soundscapes there are some XY microphones, that basically consist in two different microphones, each recording in an opposite direction. That’s what we often call “stereo” (in opposition to “mono” = single channel recording). Such microphones will record the sounds coming from all directions at similar volumes, and hence convey a feeling of three dimensional environment while listening (you will hear that Song thrush singing louder in your right ear than your left hear, as if it really was located on your right). This is probably the best choice if you want to record soundscapes.

Illustration of XY and shotgun microphones and their corresponding polar plot (i.e how much you can hear in each direction).


Classical microphones (like shotgun microphones) are composed of three parts, that are generally bought separately:

– The microphone head, that converts sound into an electronic signal.

Microphone (here a shotgun microphone – Sennheiser ME 66) ©Thomann

– A powering module, that contains the battery.

Powering module (here a Sennheiser K6). ©Thomann

– A wind protection : this is a kind of sock or bag that you put on the microphone to reduce the parasitic noise generated by the wind. You can remove it when there is no wind.

Windjammer (here a Rycote ME 66 SGM Foam) ©Thomann

Once they are put together this gives something like that :

Microphone Sennheiser ME 66/K6 + Rycote windjammer in the field.



Microphones do not “zoom” sounds. What you record is exactly what comes to your ears (with attenuated sounds coming from the sides  if you use a directional microphone).

In fact, the songs you will play on your computer will often sound clearer and louder than what you really hear in the field. This is simply because you can record sounds on the field, and then play them louder on your computer, so that the faint notes can be heard louder.

To draw a comparison with photography, this is a bit like using a digital zoom. Details appear when you look closer at the picture. This means that if the recording has a good quality (no parasite noise), you can artificially amplify a sound (see how to amplify a sound with Audacity for example) or simply put the volume of your speakers louder. If you do so, you will also amplify the parasitic noise in the background of the recording.

But there is a way to zoom directly on the sound you are recording : this is what parabolic dishes are made for. They work exactly like optical zooms on a camera : they focus more sound waves on the central microphone, so that the birds sound louder than they actually do.

A parabolic dish concentrates the sound waves hitting a big surface (the dish) on a small receptor (the microphone). Hence, the sound is amplified.

Parabolic dishes produce clearer sounds but are expensive, cumbersome and so directional that you will need to wear headphones to focus on the bird you want to record.

A parabolic dish.


A microphone transforms sounds into an electric signal. To save this signal as a readable computer data, you need a recorder. Most of the time a microphone is actually directly integrated within the recorder, so you can both record and save the audio file on the same device. But it is also possible to add an external microphone on the recorder.

External microphone and built-in microphone from the recorder ©Stanislas Wroza

In any case, keep in mind that the sound quality will depend on the quality of your microphone more than on the quality of your recorder.

Technically, you can now buy recorders that include fairly good microphones, so that you can record birds with one single pocket-sized item (a recorder). This can be a practical solution. At this stage, just remember that it can be worth buying a good microphone to put it on a medium quality recorder. The different options are discussed with more detail below


2.Different solutions for different uses

2.1 Simple recorder

Recording with a simple recorder

The easiest way to record sounds is to use a digital sound recorder with a built-in microphone. You will find a big variety of recorders on the web, at different prices.

Since the microphones included on the recorders are generally made for studio-recording use, they are not as directional as shotgun microphones, and since they are smaller the quality can be affected. This solution is very practical yet because all the device can be held in a pocket.

If you’re using directly the microphone of the recorder, don’t forget to a put wind protection on it to reduce disturbance, and see the paragraph about settings to set correctly your recorder for soundbirding.

As far as I am concerned, I own an Olympus LS-12 and I am pretty happy with it (but see below)

2.2 Shotgun microphone + recorder

This is the device that I use. The idea is to improve the quality of the recording by adding a shotgun microphone to the previous device.

I personally use the Olympus LS-12 recorder (see above) and a Sennheiser ME 66 shotgun microphone. The microphone is connected to the recorder with a XLR-Mini jack cable (plug the XLR end on the powering module of your microphone, and the Mini Jack end on the “external mic” part of your recorder.

That’s how it looks like :

My device for recording birds :
Sennheiser Me 66 + Olympus LS-12

This solution provides clearer, more focused sound recordings. If the bird is not too far, then the recording can be really good. Check out recordings my Xeno-Canto public profile to listen at recordings taken with the Olympus LS-12 + Sennheiser ME66 combination.

Don’t forget to read the paragraph about the settings if you use this kind of device (bottom of the page)


2.3 Parabolic dish + recorder

Parabolic dish

Using a parabolic dish provides an amazing directionality. Actually it is so high that you will need to wear headphones to focus while handling a large dish . Therefore, when using a parabolic dish, don’t expect to use a scope or even binoculars at the same time.

There are two ways of getting a parabolic dish :

  • Buying it (they are often very expensive. Some brands like Telinga provide all-in-one solutions for soundbirding)
  • Building it yourself. ( see for example the following tutorial : https://www.videomaker.com/article/f20/17144-how-to-build-a-parabolic-mic-dish)

Note that the choice of the microphone depends on the parabolic dish.


2.4 Build your own microphone

If you have a little budget, you can build your own microphone. I’ve seen such microphones in the US and I confirm that this is indeed possible to identify migrating birds with a homemade microphone like this one :

Build your own microphone

So depending on what you want to do this can be a good solution

3.Which settings ?

If you chose this solution, don’t forget to change your settings for a specific soundbirding use.

On the microphone :

  • Activate the high pass (= low-cut) filter. The high pass filter enables you to remove low-pitched background noise such as mechanical noise (city activity, cars). Since almost all bird songs are high-pitched, they won’t be affected.

On the recorder :

  • Set your recorder to the highest sensitivity, you want to record faint sounds, not a metal concert !
  • For the same reason, set the highest recording level.
  • Put the high-pass (= low-cut) filter of your recorder too. Because two high-pass filter are better than one !
  • Set the recording format to “Mono” if you are using an external directional microphone. With a shotgun microphone for instance, you don’t record in two different direction as in a XY microphone. Hence, recording in “Stereo” will record the same audio track twice. This takes two times more space on the memory without improving the sound quality. So chose a “Mono” format.
  • If you use an external microphone, don’t forget to select it on the menu (This will be something like “external mic ON” or “central mic OFF”)
  • Pre-recording. One interesting feature on some recorders is the pre-recording. Pre-recording enables you to start recording up to 2 seconds before you press the button for recording. So when you press the “Rec” button just after you hear this Yellow-browed warbler (Phylloscopus inornatus) call, the call will in fact already be recorded. In other words, you can record a bird that gives a single call, even if you start recording after the call. Great isn’t it ?

Read the next page of “The quick guide to soundbirding” : Softwares and audio processing

48 thoughts on “Which recording device ?

  1. Hi Stanislas,

    Great blog. Many thx. Just about to get my LS12 – delivered tomorrow – and I’ve already got a Sennheiser ME66, just wondered if you used an SDHC card as additional memory and if yes which make of card it is please.

  2. Hi,
    I am looking at setting up and I am happy with the idea of an Olympus recorder and a Sennheiser microphone but do I also need a K-6 powering module?

    1. Hi Gill,

      Yes the K-6 module is required to power the ME12 microphone. Beware to get a normal K6 and not a “phantom K6”.



        1. Bonjour Vincent, l’alimentation phantom est un autre type de connexiion électrique qui nécessite, il me semble, d’être connecté à une prise électrique (ce qu’on ne souhaite pas sur le terrain !)


  3. Salut Stan, je viens d’acheter un MKE600 et un Tascam DR40 : j’espère pouvoir en faire qq chose de correct sur le terrain ( enregistrer le bc perroquets par ex. )
    je te demanderais peut être des conseils …
    bravo pour ce site !! , amicalement, Didier

  4. Great site.
    Could I make decent bird song recordings just using the Olympus 12 you use without a separate microphone.
    Thanks, Ray

    1. Sorry for the delay Ray,

      If you want to use just a recorder without external mics, I would recommend the Zoom H4N. With that you can make decent recordings.
      The Olympus is excellent when it’s connected to an external microphone, but the “default” microphones incorporated on it are weak. Hence it’s only good with an external microphone.


      1. Hi Stan,
        One hopefully final question: What is the maximum decibel output of the ZoomH4N? In other words, if I play the recording to a roomful of people, will they be able to hear it at a decent level? Thanks.

        1. Hi Ray,
          It’s hard to answer to your question since I don’t use the Zoom H4N (I’ve juste seen some friends using it). I know that in good recording conditions and in silent places, it is possible to do some playback with it (ie. recording the bird, then attracting it with its own song). For your special use I guess that plugging a loudspeaker to the recorder would be the best solution ?


  5. I have made some super bird recordings over the years using a Zoom H2. I Now intend to upgrade to a H5 because of better sensitivity.
    You can make a decent parabolic shield with a wok lid and gopro style screws and fittings to hold the microphone. The important thing is to get going and then sort out the fine tuning of what you need later.

  6. Can someone please make a simple product recommendation for best external shotgun mic for recording bird sounds on a smartphones! There are hundreds of repetitive explanations about which mics do what.

    Are there any birdwatchers who record bird sounds on their phones? Can you get decent isolation and reach with say Rode VidMic Me? What is your set up?

  7. Bonjour,
    J’étudie un éventuel équipement en parabole, mais j’hésite. J’espère que vous pourrez m’apporter quelques conseils.
    – A priori, j’écarte telinga (coût) et une fabrication maison (difficile à optimiser). Dodotronics semble un bon compromis qualité / coût.
    – ils proposent un micro mono, et deux modèles stéréo. Mais je suis incapable de comprendre la différence ??
    Les utilisations envisagées sont les suivantes :
    – recherche chouette de tengmalm en scannant le terrain et augmentant la portée de l’oreille
    – enregistrement de migrateurs (en scannant le ciel)
    – enregistrement de beccroisés dans l’objectif d’obtenir des sonogrammes finement analysables
    – occasionnellement, pour le plaisir, enregistrement de bande son vidéo nature
    Je n’arrive pas à comprendre si la stéréo est à favoriser ou non (à part pour bande son vidéo) ?
    J’espère que vous pourrez m’apporter quelques éclairages techniques pour faire ce choix.
    Bien cordialement

    1. Bonjour,

      La seule différence entre stéréo est mono est qu’en stéréo, les sons venant de la droite et de la gauche sont séparés et enregistrés sur des canaux différents.
      Donc en stéréo, avec un casque ou des écouteurs, on entend quelque chose de différent dans l’oreille gauche et l’oreille droite. Cela donne une certaine profondeur et un confort d’écoute au son.

      En terme de détection, une mono donne la même chose qu’une stéréo (et le modèle de Dodotronics est excellent), et pour l’analyse cela ne change pas grand chose. C’est donc vraiment une simple question de goût (c’est vrai que les ambiances avec plusieurs espèces dans différentes directions en stéréo sont plus “belles” à écouter)


  8. Bonjour,

    Je m’apprête à acheter un ME66+K6 et j’ai des questions extrêmement idiotes sur le câble XLR/mini-jack. Côté XLR, est-ce qu’il faut une prise mâle ou femelle ? Ensuite, je trouve soit un câble spirale, soit des câbles de 3m de long. L’un comme l’autre ne paraît pas très pratique pour enregistrer sur le terrain. Pourriez-vous me donner la référence de votre câble ?

    Merci !

  9. Bonjour,

    J’envisage d’acheter le ME66+K6. J’ai une question très bête sur le câble XLR/mini-jack : je trouve, en gros, un câble en spirale ou des câbles de 3m de long. Dans les deux cas, ça ne paraît pas très adapté. Pourriez-vous mentionner la référence de votre câble ?

    Merci !

    PS : toutes mes excuses si ce message est un doublon, mais le précédent ne semble pas être passé.

    1. Bonjour Marie-Lan. Personnellement, j’avais acheté le duo ME66 + K6 ensemble avec le cable déjà fourni comme c’est souvent le cas sur pas mal de sites de vente et je ne suis donc pas sûr de pouvoir trouver la référence. L’achat “groupé” évite d’avoir à rechercher ces pièces détachées.
      Je pense tout de même que le câble en spirales est bien adapté pour la prise de sons naturalistes. Ca a même l’avantage d’être un peu plus élastique et donc de limiter les frottements.
      En espérant que ça vous aide.


  10. Merci ! Pour la réponse et l’ensemble du site. J’ai fini par prendre le câble spiralé (aucun câble n’était proposé avec le lot ME66+K6, d’où ma confusion). Le tout va probablement être complété d’un Tascam DR-05, dans l’espoir probablement vain de pouvoir aussi enregistrer avec les micros internes…

    Ornitho débutante, j’ai fait des progrès en identification visuelle, mais je stagne désespérément sur les cris et chants. J’espère que me concentrer sur les sons pour l’enregistrement m’aidera à les apprendre !

  11. I am looking for the manual for the Dan Gibson Parabolic dish – I just wondered if you have one or know someone who might have. Thank you

  12. Bonjour Stan,
    Je souhaitais savoir si l’Olympus 12 avec micro ou le Zoom H4N sans micro seraient suffisants pour enregistrer des individus en migr’ active sur un site côtier (différentiation des types de B-c des sapins, ID Pipit des arbres/à dos olive, etc.).
    Merci d’avance pour ta réponse, et bravo pour le site.


  13. Hello, I just obtained a Zoom F1 with shotgun mic. Can you provide me some tips on the best settings to use to begin bird recording? I’m a novice…

  14. Fantastique, un grand merci pour le partage. Votre livre “Les oiseaux par le son” a été un facteur déclenchant. Je nourrie les oiseaux, depuis de nombreuses années, ai construit des petits sanctuaires de nidification,..je reçois au quotidien une frénésie de messages sans pouvoir distinguer les raisons ou qui a produit ces enchaînements complexes sonores. Je ressens une joie sans mesure de pouvoir interagir avec certains d’entre-eux, mais les connaissances me manquent. Vous m’avez convaincu de partir sur ce long chemin de découverte et de recherches. Mille fois merci. Ma question: Je viens d’acquérir le kit Shoeps CCM2+Telinga, enregistreur Tascam DR 100 MK3, avez-vous un conseil pour le casque d’écoute.
    En vous souhaitant le meilleur et surtout toute ma sympathie pour votre engagement sincère et votre générosité à transmettre votre expertise à tous.

    1. Bonjour David. Pour le casque, je pense qu’il y a peu de différence de qualité entre les différents modèles sur des sons comme ceux des oiseaux. Il faut les essayer directement en magasin pour voir lequel est le plus confortable à porter.


  15. Bonjour,
    P’tite question d’un novice : j’ai un zoom h1 et j’envisage l’achat d’un Sennheiser me66/k6 mais il n’y a pas de prise xlr sur le zoom h1… : les câbles “basiques” xlr => jack peuvent ils suffire à faire le lien ou faut il traiter le son ?…enfin, plutôt changer d’enregistreur …

  16. Bonjour,
    Merci ! Le micro est arrivé et l’adaptateur aussi : nickel ! Je lui ai bricolé une suspension.
    Par contre des soucis avec le zoom h1, connecté ou non avec le micro :
    -bruit de fond qui apparaît quant le rétro-éclairage s’éteint (bizarre…)
    -en enregistrement, petits bruits constants genre vieille imprimante
    Si quelqu’un a le même genre de pb…

  17. Hi!

    If I buy a parabolic dish (ex telinga pro-x kit) with a 3,5 mm recorder and want to record birds in different environment (individuall birds, migration), what kind of microphone should I get? Mono/Stereo, Cardioid/omnidirectional?

    And what settings on my recorder? 96 kHz/24-bit, as high as possible, or would 44,1 kHZ/16-bit suffice? What is the difference when recording/listning and doing sonogram? Higher is better, no?

    File format? I hear that mp3 is worthless since it compresses the files to much, leading to loss of data, PCM(wav) or flac is the way 2 go?


  18. Bonjour
    j’ai commencé par votre site, puis continué avec votre livre, merci de m’avoir fait découvrir cet univers. Je me suis équipé (me 66), envisage de me fabriquer une parabole, bref je suis accro. Un problème demeure, je n’ai pas trouvé de solution satisfaisante. Je veux parler du classement des sons, avec mots clés etc…. beaucoup de choses existent pour les fichiers compressés, mais apparemment rien pour les Wav…..

    1. Bonjour Pascal,

      Avec un peu de retard, il y a le logiciel gratuit AntRenamer qui permet de classer les fichiers et de changer leur nom de façon automatisée.
      Personnellement je fais comme celà :
      Nom du dossier = date + lieu
      Nom du fichier = espèce + type de vocalisation + qualité

      En espérant que celà vous aide, merci encore !


  19. Hi Stan,
    I am new to sound recording and have only just found your site – thank you it is a great resource. I have a qustion about the Olympus LS12. I your view is the onboard preamplifier set to high gain with a external microphone optimal. Clearly it offers a huge advantage for portability but I wondered if for static recording e.g. NocMig there is any advantage improvement in using a dedicated pre-amplifier between the LS12 and the external microphone. Just curious but happy to be told I am over-complicating. BW Nick

    1. Hi Nick,

      Actually the pre-amplifiers of the Olympus LS 12 are almost never a constraint on the recording quality. Except perhaps in rare conditions where you are in perfectly quiet places, the self-noise of the microphone + parasitic noise in the environement (wind, cars…) will be much higher than the self-noise of the pre-amplifier.
      In other terms, I doubt that adding an additional pre-amplifier will improve the general quality of your the setup (you will have a louder signal, but also a proportionally louder parasitc noise). The best thing you can do to improve bird detection in nocmig is work on the quality of the external microphones.

      Hope it helps.


  20. Hello Stan, and thank you for this great site!
    I started recording bird sounds with Olympus LS-11 more actively last year. Now I´d like to buy Sennheiser ME66&K6. I have a couple of questions:
    *What kind of a cable would be good to combine LS-11 and the microphone?
    *Do you hold both the recorder and the mic in your hands while recording or do you have some way to do it?
    *Do you have some bag for transporting/protecting the equipment? This is important for me as I use bicycle while outdoors.
    Good sightings for you, with best regards

  21. Hello Stan,
    and thanks for your great site!

    I´ve been recording with Olympus LS-11 and now I´m planning to buy Sennheiser me66+k6 in addition.

    I´d be glad if you found the time to answer some questions:
    *How do transport your system? Do you have some kind of bag? I go outdoors by bike so this is crucial for me.
    *Any advice how to hold the recorder/mic combo when recording? Where to keep the recorder (in hand, pocket, attaced to the mic), how long should the cable ideally be etc?

    Good sightings!

    1. Hello Hannu,
      The Sennheiser is provided usually with a box that protects it frosm shocks. But you can also carry it directly in your bag.
      I use a 1m cable and hold the microphone with a small perch to avoid manipulation noise.


  22. Thank you so much for your informative articles! I used the information here to put together a <$500 system based on the SoundShark 9" parabolic receiver (with lots of help from the vendor https://kloverproducts.com/sound-shark/) that I use with my smart phone and BirdNet or Merlin apps to ID birds. Works great!

  23. I wnat to buy the guneine and high quality recorder so can u please suggest me the best one and wre will I get that recorder in banglore

  24. Bonjour Stanislas,
    J’aimerai d’abord te féliciter pour tes trois livres sur la prise de son naturaliste, tu as en quelque sorte ouvert le chemin….
    Ayant acheter une parabole Télinga et sa poignée d’occasion, j’aimerais savoir ce que je peux y mettre comme micro pas trop cher ;Est ce que le kit Stereo EM272 Omni module conviendrait et comment trouver le point focal ?
    En te remerciant

    1. Bonjour Michel, oui le kit Stereo EM 272 fait l’affaire, pour le point focal le mieux est de faire des tests en faisant varier la distance au centre.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *